مدیریت دولتی

مدیریت دولتی

معناسازی: تحلیل مفهومی و کاربست‌ها در مدیریت منابع انسانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
هادی عارف 1
سیدرضا سیدجوادین 2
علی اصغر پورعزت 3
قنبر محمد الیاسی 4
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی، گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 استاد، گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیار، گروه توسعه کارآفرینی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران
10.22059/jipa.2019.268468.2405
چکیده
هدف: هدف این پژوهش معرفی و مشخص‌کردن چیستی معناسازی و کاربردهای این مفهوم در مدیریت منابع انسانی است. به‌کارگیری آن برای تحلیل موضوعات مدیریت و به‌ویژه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانش موجود به این موضوعات را به نحو چشمگیری افزایش می‌دهد و بر اثربخشی اقدامات منابع انسانی می‌افزاید.
روش: تحلیل مفهومی، رویکرد اصلی این پژوهش است. در این رابطه، روش‌شناسی تحلیل مفهومی سودابی مبنای کار قرار گرفته است. در این مدل با انجام چهار عمل روی مفاهیم، می‌توان چیستی آنها را مشخص و معنای آنها را شفاف کرد. این چهار عمل عبارت‌اند از: تعریف، مقایسه با مفاهیم مشابه، مشخص ساختن حدود مفهوم و نمایش انسجام منطقی مفهوم مدنظر.
یافته‌ها: شفاف‌سازی چیستی معناسازی؛ مقایسه و برشمردن تفاوت‌های آن با مفاهیم مشابه همچون معنادهی؛ تفسیر و کنش؛ مشخص‌ساختن حدود مکانی، زمانی و ارزشی این مفهوم و نشان‌دادن انسجام منطقی معناسازی با به‌کار بستن آن در نظریه نیروی سیستم‌های منابع انسانی یافته‌های اصلی این پژوهش است.
نتیجه‌گیری: چشم‌انداز معناسازی، بنیان مفهومی مناسبی برای اجرای پژوهش‌های نوآورانه در موضوعات منابع انسانی همچون پروژه‌های تغییر منابع انسانی، کارمندیابی و انتخاب، جامعه‌پذیری کارکنان، شایستگی معناسازی و شایستگی معنادهی است. فهم موجود از این موضوعات از طریق به‌کارگیری چشم‌انداز معناسازی بهبود پیدا خواهد کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
معناسازی
مدیریت منابع انسانی
تحلیل مفهومی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Sensemaking: Concept Analysis and Implications for Human Resource Management

نویسندگان English

Hadi Aref 1
Seyyed Reza Seyyed Javadin 2
Ali Asghar Pourezzat 3
Ghanbar Mohammad Elyasi 4
1 Phd Candidate, Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Prof., Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Prof., Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Prof., Department of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Objective:The aim of this study is to investigate the nature and application of the sensemaking concept. Applying this framework to analyze human resource management issues can drastically enhance the extant knowledge of those issues and increase the effectiveness of HR practices. However, almost no research has been done -inside Iran- on human resource management and sensemaking.
Methods: Conceptual analysis is the primary research approach for this paper. Suddaby conceptual analysis methodology forms the basis of our analyses. According to this model,  we can clarify the meaning of the concepts through conducting four operations on concepts,: defining the concept, demarcating the concept against other related concepts, specifying the scope conditions of the concept and finally illustrating the logical coherence of the concept.
Results: The main findings of this study include clarifying the nature of sensemaking, comparing it to similar concepts such as sensegiving, interpretation and action, specifying its place, time and value scope and illustrating its logical consistency by applying it to the ‘strength of HR systems’ theory.
Conclusion: Sensemaking perspective constitutes a conceptual basis for doing innovative research on HR related areas such as human resources change projects, recruitment and selection, employee socialization, sensemakig competence and sensegiving competence. Applying sensemaking perspective on these areas could enhance the existing understanding of such concepts.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sensemaking
Human resource management
Conceptual analysis
ذهاوی، دان (2003)، پدیدارشناسی هوسرل، ترجمه مهدی صاحبکار و ایمان واقفی (1392)، تهران: نشر روزبهان.
نیک نیا، معصومه؛ منصوریان، یزدان (1395)، بازنمایی پیوندهای مفهومی سه نظریه رفتار اطلاعاتی بر بنیاد فراگرد معنابخشی، فصلنامه نقد کتاب اطلاع رسانی و ارتباطات، شماره 12، صفحه 207-224.
 
References
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational Restructuring and Middle Manager Sensemaking. Academy Of Management Journal. Academy of Management, 47(4), 523–549.
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2005). From Intended Strategies to Unintended Outcomes: The Impact of Change Recipient Sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1573–1601.
Balogun, J., Bartunek, J. M., & Do, B. (2015). Senior Managers’ Sensemaking and Responses to Strategic Change. Organization Science, 26(4), 960–979.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday.
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding Hrm-Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” Of the Hrm System. Academy Of Management Review. Academy of Management, 29(2), 203-221.
Burr, V. (2003). Social Constructionism (2nd ed.). Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).
Cornelissen, J. P. (2012). Sensemaking under Pressure: The Influence of Professional Roles and Social Accountability on the Creation of Sense. Organization Science, 23(1), 118–137.
De Vos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological Contract Development during Organizational Socialization: Adaptation to Reality and the Role of Reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 537–559.
Gephart, R. P. (1993). The Textual Approach: Risk and Blame in Disaster Sensemaking. Academy Of Management Journal. Academy Of Management, 36(6), 1465–1514.
Gephart, R. P., Topal, C., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Future-Oriented Sensemaking: Temporalities and Institutional Legitimation. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing (Pp. 275–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gerhart, B. (2012). Construct Validity, Causality, and Policy Recommendations: The Case of High Performance Work Practices Systems. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 157–160.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University Of California Press.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991a). Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.
Gupta, A. (2015). "Definitions", the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Hill, R. C., & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and Mental Models: Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Innovative and Entrepreneurial Activities. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1057–1074.
Ito, K., & Inohara, T. (2015). A Model Of Sense-Making Process For Adapting New Organizational Settings; Based On Case Study Of Executive Leaders In Work Transitions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 142–149.
Klein, H. J., & Delery, J. E. (2012). Construct Clarity In Human Resource Management Research: Introduction To The Special Issue. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 57–61.
Labianca, G., Gray, B., & Brass, D. J. (2000). A Grounded Model Of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment. Organization Science, 11(2), 235–257.
Locke, E. A. (2012). Construct Validity Vs. Concept Validity. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 146–148.
Lockett, A., Currie, G., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2014). The Influence of Social Position on Sensemaking about Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1102–1129.
Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and Sense Making: What Newcomers Experience In Entering Unfamiliar Organizational Settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226.
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational Change And Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox. Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management, 51(2), 221–240.
Maitlis, S. (2005a). The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.
Maitlis, S. (2009). Who Am I Now? Sensemaking and Identity In Posttraumatic Growth. In L. Morgan Roberts & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations: Building A Theoretical And Research Foundation (Pp. 47–76). New York: Psychology Press.
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.
Niknia, M., Yazdan, M (2016), Representing the Conceptual Link Among Three Theories Of Informational Behavior On The Basis Of Sensemkaing Process, Information and Communication Quarterly Book Review, 12, 207-223. (in Persian)
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding To Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring The Role Of Organizational Culture. Academy Of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458.
Rothausen, T. J., Henderson, K. E., Arnold, J. K., & Malshe, A. (2017). Should I Stay Or Should I Go? Identity And Well-Being In Sensemaking About Retention And Turnover. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2357–2385.
Sandberg, J., & Targama, A. (2007). Managing Understanding in Organizations. Sage Publications.
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making Sense Of The Sensemaking Perspective: Its Constituents, Limitations, And Opportunities For Further Development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S6–S32.
Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press.
Settoon, R. P., & Adkins, C. L. (1997). Newcomer Socialization: The Role of Supervisors, Coworkers, Friends and Family Members. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11(4), 507–516.
Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The Management of Meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3), 257–273.
Stensaker, I., & Falkenberg, J. (2007). Making Sense of Different Responses to Corporate Change. Human Relations, 60(1), 137-177.
Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357.
Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. (1993). Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages Among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 239–270.
Weber, P.S., & Manning, M. R. (2001). CauseMaps, Sensemaking, andPlannedOrganizationalChange. TheJournalofAppliedBehavioralScience, 37(2), 227–251.
Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305–317.
Weick, K. E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628-652.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications.
Weick, K. E. (2010). Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking In The Bhopal Disaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 537–550.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Weinberg, D. (2014). Contemporary Social Constructionism: Key Themes. Temple University Press.
Winnie, J. A. (1967). The Implicit Definition of Theoretical Terms. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18(3), 223–229.
Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2007). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. CAHRS Working Paper Series, 468.
Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s Phenomenology, Translated by Mehdi Sahebkar and Iman Vaghefi, Rouzbahan Publications, Tehran