تحلیل نقش حکمرانی خوب در ارتقای توسعۀ انسانی: بررسی بین‌المللی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس‎ارشد مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی گرایش مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

4 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

5 کارشناس‎ارشد مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

6 استادیار دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تأثیر شاخص‏های شش‌گانۀ حکمرانی خوب بر شاخص توسعۀ انسانی می‏پردازد. در پژوهش پیش رو شاخص توسعۀ انسانی (HDI)، متغیر وابسته؛ ابعاد حکمرانی خوب، متغیرهای مستقل و توسعۀ فناوری ارتباطات متغیر تعدیل‏کننده در نظر گرفته شده است. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر اقتصادسنجی است و از روش تحلیل داده‏های پانل و تحلیل رگرسیون GLS برای آزمون فرضیه‏های پژوهش استفاده شده است. یافته‏های تخمین مدل برای کشورهای با سرانۀ تولید ناخالص داخلی کمتر از 6800 دلار در سال نشان می‏دهد ضریب متغیرهای کنترل فساد، ثبات سیاسی، اثربخشی حکومت، آزادی بیان و حق اظهارنظر و درصد کاربران اینترنت معنا‏دار است و می‏توان برای تخمین توسعۀ انسانی از آنها استفاده کرد. همچنین معادلۀ پیش‏بینی برای کشورهای با سرانۀ تولید ناخالص داخلی بیشتر از 6800 دلار در سال نشان می‏دهد ضرایب متغیرهای اثربخشی حکومت، مقررات تنظیمی و درصد کاربران اینترنت در مدل معنادار‌‌‌‌ند. درنهایت‌ بر اساس یافته‎ها در کشورهای آسیای جنوب غربی ضریب متغیرهای ثبات سیاسی و اثربخشی حکومت در معادلۀ پیش‏بینی سطح توسعۀ انسانی معنادار‌ند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Good Governance in the Promotion of Human Development: an international Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohsen Omidian 1
  • Gholamreza Taleghani 2
  • fereshte Mohammadi 3
  • Jamal Firouzi 4
  • Hamidreza Yaghobi 5
  • Hamza Khastar 6
1 M.A in Human resource Management, Pardis Alborz , University of Tehran
2
3
4
5
6
چکیده [English]

Recent study examines the impact of good governance on the Human Development Index. In the present study, the Human Development Index (HDI) considered as dependent variable, good governance is independent variables and the development of communication technology has been considered as the moderator variable. The study approach is econometric panel data analysis and GLS regression analysis was used to test the research hypotheses. Findings of model for countries with per capita GDP of less than U.S. $ 6,800 shows that the coefficients of the control of corruption, political stability, government effectiveness and freedom of expression are at significant level and can be used to estimate the level of human development. The prediction equation for countries with GDP higher than $ 6,800 per year shows that the coefficients of the variables of government effectiveness, regulatory quality and internet users are significant. Finally, finding suggests that in the Southeastern countries of Asia the coefficients of the political stability and government effectiveness are significant for predicting levels of human development .

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Good Governance
  • Human Development Index
  • Internet
  • panel data
  • GLS method

مراجع

Abbasi Nejad, H. & Rafiee Emam, A.N. (2006).Evaluation of indicators of human development in rural areas. Journal of Economic Research, 72:  31-54.
(in Persian)
Afshani, A., Ebrahimpoor, S. & Askari Nadooshan, A. (2011). Comparison of human based on development indices in the rural areas of the country in 1375 and 1385. Quarterly journal of development and rural, 14(3):1-18.
(in Persian)
Anand, S. & Sen, A. K. (1996). Sustainable human development: concepts and periorities. Office of development studies discussion paper. No 1. New York: UNDP.
Baradaran Shoraka, H. & Malek al-sadati, S. (2008). The impact of good governance on economic growth in selected countries. Journal of Strategy, (49): 27-52. (in Persian)
Bennedsen, M. & Malchow-Moller, N & VintenF. (2005). Institutions and Growth: a Literature Survey. Center for Economic and Business Research (CEBR).
Bridges.org. (2005). E-Ready for What? E-Readiness in Developing Countries: Current Status and Prospects toward the Millennium Development Goals. Cape Town: Bridges.org.
Dabbaq, S. & Nafari, N. (2009). The explanation of Good concept of good governance. Journal of Public Administration, 1(3): 3-18. (in Persian)
Ebrahimpoor, H. & Roshandel Arbatani,T. (2008). Explaining the Role of the National Media(IRIB) in Sustainability Governance Model in Iran. Jouranl of Public Administration, 0(1): 43-62. (in Persian)
Engerman S.L & Sokoloff, K.L.  (2005). Colonialism, Inequality and long-run paths of development. Working Paper 11057. National Bureau of Economic Resesarch. Cambridge, MA.
Feng, Y. (2003). Democracy, Governance and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.
Fosu, A.K. (2001). Political Instability and Economic Growth in Developing Economies: Some Specification Empirics. Economics letters, 70(2): 289-294.
GeoSINC. (2002). e-Readiness Guide-How to Develop and Implement a National e-Readiness Action Plan in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: infoDev - The World Bank. GeoSINC International.
Gilbert, N. (2003). Trade  openness  policy,  Quality  of  instituations  and  economic  growth,  University Auvergne Clermont, Frrand, France.
Grindle, S. M. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5): 553-574.
‌Hosseini, M.A. (1994). Human Development Index in rural provinces in the national and global scale. Jihad, 17: 9-17. (in Persian)
Johnson, R. W. & Minis, H. (1990). Toward democratic decentralization. USA ID Washington.
Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics, 7: 207-227.
Mahany, A.S., Barouni, M., Mohammadzadeh, A., Mashali, B. & Rezapour, A. (2010). Comparing of townships efficiency of Kerman province in accessing to human development index (HDI) via Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) - 2001& 2007. Teb va Tazkieh, 76: 46-101.
‌Mahmoodi, M.J. (2008). Measurmenet of human-development index: the country, Tehran province and its sub-cities. Quarterly journal of population, (67-68): 81-118. (in Persian)
Matsuo, H. (2005). The Rule of Law and Economic Development: A Causeor a Result? In The: Role of Law in Development: Past, Present and Future, ed. Y. Matsuura, CALE Books 2. Nagoya: Nagoya University.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 681-712.
Meydari, A. & Kheirkhahan, J. (2004). Good Governance. Majlis Research Center.
Mirshojaeyan Hosseini, H. & Rahbar, F. (2011). Understanding Ali’s relationship among good governance components in the countries which are at the risk of natural resource curse. Nameye Mofid, No 87.
Moghimi, S.M. & Alayee, M. (2011). Assessing the criteria of good governance and the role of government in promoting it. Quarterly Journal ofInformationTechnology Management, 3(8): 171-188. (in Persian)
Noorbakhsh, F. (2002). Human development and regional disparities in Iran: a policy model. Journal of international development, 14 (7): 927-949.
Polat, R.K. (2005). The Internet and Political Participation Exploring the Explanatory Links. European Journal of Communication, 20(4): 435-459.
Qolipoor, R.A. (2004). Feasibility analysis and good governance with emphasis on the role of government in Iran. Management Knowledge, 67: 85-111.
Renani, M. (2003). The government's role in institutional reforms through legislation. The parliament and research, 10(39): 13-30.  (in Persian)
Rizk, N. (2004). E-Readiness Assessment of Small and Medium Enterprises in Egypt: A Micro Study. Cairo.
Roy, I. (2008). Civil society & good government. Re conceptualizing the interface. World development, 36 (4): 667-705.
Sabaq Kermani, M. & Baskha, M. (2009). The role of good governance in improving the functioning of government expenditure: Case study: Islamic countries health and education sectors. Journal of Economic Research, 4(1): 109-130. (in Persian)  
Sagar, A. D. & Najam, A. (1997). The human development index: a critical Review. Ecological Economics, 25: 249–264.
Sameti, M., Ranjbar, H. & Mohseni, F. (2011). The analysis of the impact of good governance on the Human Development Index; Case Study; Southeast Asian countries. Quarterly journal ofresearch growth and economic development, 1(4): 183-223. (in Persian) 
Shahabadi, A. & Pourjavan, A. (2010). Rule, competitiveness and economic growth in selected countries. Strategy Development Journal. 22: 129-168.
(in Persian) 
Suryadarma, D. (2008). Corruption, Public Spending and Outcomes: Evidences from Indonesia, Economics and Democracy Conference. The AustralianNational University, Canberra.
Taqvayee, M. (2006). Analysis and classification of rural areas in the provinces on the basis of human development indicators. Geographical Investigation, 82: 28-44. (in Persian) 
Taqvayee, M. & Noroozi Avargani, A. (2010). Determining the level of analysis to rural areas nationwide by using numerical taxonomy and cluster analysis method. Planning Welfareand social development, 5: 91-116. (in Persian) 
The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2010). Digital economy rankings 2010 beyond e-readiness. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.
UNDP. (2013). Human Development Report 2013: The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. Available online: http: //hdi.undp.org.
WDI. (2007). World Development Indicators. The World Bank, Washington DC. 19. (1): 46-58.
Ziaeipour, E., Taghizade, A., Bazazan, F., Khoshalhan, F. & Mohamadian, A. (2009). Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. pp: 993-998. IEEE Computer Society.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار