ارزیابی مدیریت پدیدۀ نظم در سیستم‌های شهری بر اساس طراحی متغیرهای اندازه‌گیرندۀ سطح اثر بخشی در سیستم‌ها و کاربرد عملیاتی آن در نگرش نوین به مدیریت بحران

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس‎ارشد مهندسی سیستم‎های اقتصادی ـ اجتماعی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران

چکیده

اطلاع از وضعیت دینامیکی پدیدۀ نظم در سیستم‎های شهری همراه با تجزیه‎وتحلیل اطلاعات دریافت‎شده از رفتار تصادفی آن، گامی اساسی در فرایند مدیریت بحران‌های شهری معرفی شده است. در این زمینه، مطالعۀ حاضر متناظر با هر یک از «الزام‌های کارکردی پایه‌ای در سیستم مدیریت نظم شهری»، متغیر تصادفی ویژه‌ای را طراحی کرده است و پس از آن، به توسعۀ روشی برای اندازه‌گیری سطح اثربخشی سیستم مدیریت دینامیک پدیدۀ نظم در سیستم‌های شهری پرداخته است. پژوهش پیش رو با روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی، در جامعۀ آماری متشکل از فرماندهی انتظامی و راهنمایی ـ رانندگی شهر تهران، سازمان شهرداری تهران، اورژانس تهران و رسانه‌های جمعی، بر اساس نمونۀ تصادفی با حجم نهایی 140 واحد آزمایشی، بر مبنای رویکرد نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای، اجرا شده است. این مطالعه، بازبینی نحوۀ تغییرات احتمال برآورده‌سازی هریک از «الزام‌های کارکردی ریشه‌ای» را پایه‌ای مناسب برای مدیریت اثربخش پدیدۀ نظم در سیستم‌های شهری معرفی می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of civil order phenomenon management based on designing variables measuring level of system effectiveness and its application in modern approach to crisis management

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Jalil Lajevardi 1
  • Ali Mollajan 2
1 Assistant Prof., Faculty of Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 M.Sc. in Industrial Engineering-Socio-Economic Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Today, “Civil Order” may be regarded as one of the most important “Functional Requirements” (FR) of any city, as a real, complex, large-scale system. In this regard, learning about dynamic behavior of the civil order phenomenon and analysis of all information obtained from “Operational Environment” associated with the system of interest may be considered an essential step in the process of “Crisis Management” for mega-cities. For this reason, the present study aims to develop a way for evaluating the effectiveness level of civil order management system by establishing a set of quantitative variables, based on which we can eventually obtain the probability of successfully meeting each of the root-FRs, which is basically required to manage the civil order phenomenon behavior in the system (city) of interest. To verify the practical capability of the presented method, this study, as an analytical-descriptive research, focuses on a population, which consists of “Tehran’s Police Chief Dep.”, “Tehran’s Municipality Org.”, “Tehran’s Emergency Medical Services Org.”, and “Public Media (TV, Radio, and Presses)”, from which, finally,  140 participants are randomly drawn using “Stratified Sampling Method” to be inquired. Library Studies, Face-to-Face/Telephone Interviews, and Researcher–made Questionnaires are all three ways specifically used for gathering all required data and information. This study considers learning of changes in probability of successfully fulfilling each of the system root-FRs to be a sound basis for effective management of civil order phenomenon.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • civil order phenomenon
  • Crisis Management
  • Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
  • root functional requirements
  • systems theory
Abedi Jafari, H., Abooyee Ardakan, M. & Aghazadeh, F. (2011). Mapping “Urban Management Science” Based on ISI Subject Areas. JournalofPublicAdministration, 3(7): 131-138. (inPersian)                                                    
Ahmadi, S.A., Rasuli, R., Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A. & Pooya, P. (2012). Presenting a Crisis Management Model with Emphasis on Human Resources Management System for Hospitals of Tehran.JournalofPublicAdministration, 4(18): 1-24. (inPersian)
Akao, Y. (1994). RecentApproachofQualityFunctionDeployment. In: Mizuno, S., Akao, Y. (Eds.), QFD: The Customer- Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Development. Tokyo:AsianProductivityOrganization, PP. 339.               
Blanchard, B. S. & Fabrycky, W.J. (2010). SystemsEngineeringandAnalysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.   
Booth S.A. (1993). CrisisManagementStrategy-CompetitionandChangeinModernEnterprises. London:Routledge.
Buede, D. M. (2009). TheEngineeringDesignofSystems:ModelsandMethods. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons.                     
Franceschini, F. (2002). AdvancedQualityFunctionDeploymentQFD. Boca Raton, Florida : St. Lucie Press.                             
Green, J.M. (2001). EstablishingSystemMeasureofEffectiveness. Proceedingof the AIAA Biennial National Forum on Weapon System Effectiveness, the John Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, March, 27-29
Green, J.P. & Bonnie, W. J. (2002). Towards a Theory of Measures of Effectiveness. CommandandControlResearchandTechnologySymposium, Monterey, CA, June, 11-13.
 Hauser, J. R. & Clausing, D. (1988). The House of Quality. HarvardBusinessReview, 66(3): 63-73.                                                             
Kameli, M. (2009). ModelingNetworkPolicyMakinginPoliceOrganizations(unpublished). Ph.D. Dissertation,Allameh Tabatabaie University (ATU), Tehran, Iran. (inPersian)
Kameli, M., Lajavardi, J., Nemati, R. & Mollajan, A. (2013). Persistent External Coordination in Crisis Management and Its Role on Improvement of Organizational Performance. JournalofPublicAdministration, 4 (14): 117-134. (inPersian)
Kotonia, G. and Sommerville, I. (1998), “Requirements Enginering - Processes and Techniques”, JohnWiley&Sons.               
Mele, C., Pels, J. & Polese, F. (2010). A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications. ServiceScience, 2 (1/2): 126-135.
Merriam-Webster Online. (2013). InMerriam-Webster.RetrievedJanuary2, 2013, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/citation.
Mitroff, I. I., Shrivastava, P. & Udwadia, F. E. (1978). Effective Crisis Management. AcademyofManagementExecutiveJournal, 1(4): 283-292.
Mollajan, A. (2010). DesignofaNewPolicingSystemforIran’sPoliceBasedonSystemsEngineeringPrinciples(unpublished). Compulsory Military Service Projects for Iran's Elite National Talents, I.R.I’s Police University, Tehran, Iran. (inPersian)
Pourezzat, A. & Raheimian, A. (2012). Public Policy Necessities for Administration of Complex and Different Cities (Case study: Tehran). JournalofPublicAdministration, 4(10): 25-44. (inPersian)                                      
Suh, N.P. (2007). Ergonomics, Axiomatic Design & Complexity Theory. TheoreticalIssuesinErgonomicsScience, 8 (2):101-121.
Suh, N.P. (1995). Design and Operation of Large Systems. JournalofManufacturingSystems, 14 (3): 203-213.                                                           
Taleghani, G., Farhangi, A. & Abedijafari, A. (2010). Developing A Model of Factors Affecting the Citizens Trust Toward Urban Management.JournalofPublicAdministration, 2(4): 89-106. (inPersian)
Wasson, C.S. (2006). System Analysis, Design, and Development Concepts, Principles, and Practices. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons.