نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، پردیس بینالمللی ارس، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکدۀ کسبوکار، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت رسانه و ارتباطات و کسبوکار، دانشکدۀ مدیریت کسبوکار، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیار، گروه آیندهپژوهی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه بینالمللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران.
5 دانشیار، گروه CIICISI، دانشکده علوم و فناوری، پلی تکنیک پورتو، ۴۶۱۰ فلگویراس، پرتغال.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Objective
This study aims to develop an innovative approach for analyzing inter-unit interactions and uncovering hidden relational structures within public sector organizations. In many governmental bodies, the apparent coordination—or lack thereof—among departments reflects only a partial and surface-level representation of multi-layered and complex decision-making. Numerous organizational decisions are made such that, even in the absence of formal coordination, a kind of informal and structural alignment emerges among different units. This phenomenon, which is rarely documented in official reports or organizational charts, plays a critical role in policy implementation effectiveness. Given rising complexity, institutional pressures, environmental uncertainty, and inter-unit interdependencies, identifying and analyzing these hidden relationships has become a strategic necessity for managers and policymakers.
Methods
Grounded in the theoretical foundations of complex systems and emerging approaches in decision analysis, this study develops a behavioral simulation model that enables managers to identify hidden patterns of interaction between organizational units. In the model, two major organizational departments are treated as independent decision-makers. Their behavioral responses to various environmental scenarios—such as budget fluctuations, political pressures, and shifting operational priorities—are analyzed. By adjusting these external variables and monitoring how both units respond, patterns of alignment or divergence in their decision-making are revealed. Unlike traditional tools that focus solely on decision outcomes, this model delves into the underlying process and logic, capturing deeper, often unseen, layers of inter-organizational behavior. The core objective is to identify fundamental structural dependencies that, while not visible on the surface, are critical to organizational functioning.
Results
The simulation results demonstrate that decisions made by different units are often structurally aligned, even in the absence of formal communication or explicit coordination. For example, under environmental stress or resource constraints, two departments (such as Human Resources and Planning) independently made complementary decisions. This finding suggests that inter-unit alignment may stem from latent mechanisms such as shared institutional understanding, organizational memory, or prior informal interactions, rather than from formal directives or hierarchical structures. Additionally, the results indicate that environmental fluctuations can amplify or diminish the degree of this hidden alignment or latent conflict. Consequently, continuously monitoring these relationships and analyzing their depth is essential for preventing future tensions and discovering synergistic opportunities.
Conclusion
In today’s complex governance landscapeو characterized by institutional fragmentation, ambiguous decision-making, and multilevel interdependence traditional organizational analysis tools are insufficient. The model proposed in this study addresses this gap conceptually and practically. It enables managers to develop a nuanced understanding of internal interactions, identify hidden alignment capacities, and design structures that leverage synergies while mitigating internal friction. Furthermore, this analytical approach shifts the focus from superficial statistical relationships to deeper, contextual, and structural organizational dynamics. The model can thus serve as a strategic decision-support tool, particularly during crises or periods of rapid change. It is recommended that senior public sector managers integrate this model into structural analyses, performance evaluations, and policy design. Such integration fosters a fresh perspective on internal relationships, supporting smarter, more integrated, and forward-looking decisions.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)