بررسی مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی مطلوب در پروژه‌های بزرگ‌مقیاس چندسازمانۀ مشارکت مدنی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری تربیت مدرس

2 گروه مدیریت پروژه و ساخت دانشکده هنر دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 ‏دانشیار، گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.‏

چکیده

سیستم حکمرانی در پروژه­های بزرگ‌مقیاس که به‌منظور اجرای آن، شرکت‌های متنوعی با عنوان قرارداد مشارکت حضور پیدا می­کنند، می‌تواند بر عملکرد مشارکت تأثیرگذار باشد. با بررسی ادبیات موضوع در این زمینه و به‎منظور پرکردن شکاف تحقیقاتی، الزام به شناسایی مؤلفه­ها و اصول حکمرانی مطلوب در بستر مشارکت پروژه­های بزرگ­مقیاس مشخص شد. هدف این پژوهش درک عمیق تأثیرگذاری حکمرانی بر پروژه­های بزرگ­مقیاس چندسازمانۀ مشارکت مدنی و اصول مطلوبیت است. به‎کمک روش تحقیق کیفی و اکتشافی، مطالعه‎ای روی شش مورد مشارکت بالادستی پارس جنوبی انجام گرفت و به‌منظور تحلیل داده­ها و یافتن روابط میان آنها، از روش گراندد تئوری استفاده شد. در نخستین گام، مؤلفه­های حکمرانی موجود و پیامدهای آن شناسایی شدند. پس از تکرار مصاحبه با جامعۀ تحقیق، مؤلفه‎های حکمرانی مطلوب متشکل از ساختار، فرایند و سازوکار حکمرانی به‎دست آمد و در انتها، مدل حکمرانی مطلوب بر اساس اصول حکمرانی مطلوب و رعایت منافع تمامی ذی‎نفعان در پروژه طراحی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Components of Good Governance in Mega Multi-firm Projects in a Consortium

نویسندگان [English]

  • samira kolbehdari 1
  • mohamadhossein sobhiyah 2
  • Seyed Nasrollah Ebrahimi 3
1 phd student
2 Project Managemet and Construction Department, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 ‏Associate Prof. Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.‎
چکیده [English]

The system of governance in multi-firm projects that requires implementing a variety of companies under the consortium agreement can affect the performance of the consortium. According to the literature review and the recognition of the research gap, the researchers found it necessary to identify the components and criteria of good governance in the context of mega multi-firm projects in a consortium. The purpose of this study is to grasp the deep-seated influence of governance on mega multi-firm projects in a consortium and an understanding of utility criteria. Using qualitative and exploratory research methods, six upstream consortium of South Pars Project were investigated. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data and find any probable relationships between them. In the first step, the components of the existing governance and its consequences were identified; then, by repeating the interviews with the research community, the components of the good governance consisting of the structure, process, and governance mechanism were introduced. Finally, an optimum governance model was proposed based on the criteria of good governance and observing the interests of all the stakeholders in the project.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Consortium
  • Good Governance
  • Governance mechanism
  • Governance system
  • Mega multi-firm projects
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, (PMBOK® Guide) - Fifth Edition. (2013). USA: Project ‎Management Institute.‎
Anderson, E. (1990). Two Firms, One Frontier: On Assessing Joint Venture Performance. Sloan Management Review, ‎‎31(2), 19-30.
Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30 (4), 25-32.
Bakker, A. B., Boyd, C. M., Dollard, M., Gillespie, N., Winefield, A. H., & Stough, C. (2010). The role of personality in the job demands-resources model: A study of Australian academic staff. Career Development International, 15(7), 622-636.
Beamish, P. W. (1987). Joint ventures in LDCs: Partner selection and performance. Management International Review, 27 (1), 23-37.
Beamish, P. W. (2008). Joint venturing. Charlotte. NC: Information Age.
Capka, J. R. (2004). Megaprojects: Managing a Public Journey. Public Roads, 68(1), Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Chan, A. P. C. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: an international journal, 11, 203-221.
Chen, Q., Reichard, G., & Beliveau, Y. (2007). Interface Management: A Facilitator of Lean Construction and Agile Project Management. In Proc. of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, July 18-20, East Lansing, MI, 57-66.
Christina Scott-Young, D. S. (2008). Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 749-766.
Crawford, Gregory, & Shum, M. (2005). Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica, 73(4), 1137-1173.
Dollinger, M. J., & Golden, P. A. (1992). Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: Environmental effects and performance. Journal of Management, 18, 695-715.
Eweje, J., Turner, R., & Müller, R. (2012). Maximizing strategic value from megaprojects: The influence of information-feed on decision-making by the project manager. International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), 639-651.
Geringer, J. M. & Hebert, L. (1989). Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(2), 235-254.
Geringer, J., & Hebert., L. (1991). Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 249-263.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory, Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of the Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter,New York.
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliance and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 24.
Herman, L. E. (2015). Re-evaluating the post-communist success story: party elite loyalty, citizen mobilization and the erosion of Hungarian democracy. European Political Science Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 1-34.
Ho, P., Lin, Y., Chu, W., & Wu, H. (2009). Model for Organizational Governance Structure Choices in Construction Joint Ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering And Management, 135(6).
Keuleers, P. (2004). Governance in the Least developed countries in Asia and Pacific: An assessment of the current situation. Bangkok: UNDP.
Lim, C. S., & Mohamed, M. Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: an exploratory re- examination. International Journal of Project Management, 17, 243-248.
Lin, Y.-H. & Ho. S. P. (2013). Impacts of Governance Structure Strategies on the Performance of Construction Joint Ventures. Journal of construction engineering and management march, 139(3), 304-311.
Müller, R. (2009). Project Governance, Gower Publishing Company. Aldershot, UK.
Ozorhon, P., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, T. M. (2007). Using analytic network process to predict the performance of international construction joint ventures. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(3), 156-163.
Spanhove, J., & Verhoest, K. (2007). Corporate governance vs. government governance: translation or adaptation? Paper for the Eiasm 4th Workshop on Corporate Governance, Brussels, 15-16, 40.
Sylvester, D. C. & Rani, N.S.A. (2010). Theoretical Framework: Factors for Project Success in Oil & Gas Companies & Contractors in Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia. 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research, 1-4.
Tan, Y. X., & Yang, Z. J. (2016). Contingent Capital, Capital Structure and Investment. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 56-73.
Tsang, E. (1998). Motives for strategic alliance; a resource based perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207-221.
Turner, R. (2016). Gower Handbook of Project Management. United Nations Development Programme, New York.
Turner, R. (2018). The management of the project-based organization: A personal reflection. International Journal of Project Management, 36, 231-240.
Xie, B. H., Kumaraswamy, M., & Chung, J. K. H. (2011). Using ‘whole life cycle value’ to evaluate infrastructure megaprojects. Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment, 20 – 23 June 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded Theory: An Exploration of Process and Procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 547-559.
Winch, G. (2006). Towards a Theory of Construction as Production by Projects. Building Research & Information, 34, 154-161.
Yan, A. & Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478-1517.