بررسی دلایل اثربخش نبودن عملکرد سیستم خط مشی گذاری ایران در زمینۀ فقرزدایی (مطالعۀ موردی: لایحۀ «فقرزدایی در کشور جمهوری اسلامی ایران»)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة مدیریت دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی ، دانشکدة مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت دولتی ، دانشکدة مدیریت دانشگاه تهران (پردیس قم)، تهران، ایران

چکیده

رفع معضل فقر به­منزلة یک مسئلة عمومی پیچیده، بیش از هر چیز متأثر از عملکرد سیستم خط‌مشی­گذاری عمومی در زمینة فقرزدایی است؛ به‌گونه­ای که می­توان کاهش یا افزایش میزان فقر در سطح جامعه را تابعی از عملکرد سیستم خط مشی­گذاری کشور در زمینة فقرزدایی دانست. در پژوهش حاضر، پس از تبیین اثربخش نبودن عملکرد سیستم خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی ایران در زمینة فقرزدایی، علل این مسئله با تمرکز بر لایحة «فقرزدایی در ایران» منزله نمونه­ای از عملکرد سیستم مذکور (به­صورت مطالعة موردی) بررسی شده است. بدین­صورت که ابتدا بر­اساس فرضیه­های سه­گانة پژوهش، مهم­ترین علل احتمالی اثربخش نبودن عملکرد سیستم خط مشی­گذاری کشور در زمینة فقرزدایی، در قالب سه مؤلفة «کوتاهی و غفلت خط مشی­گذاران»، «ناکارآمدی سیستم خط مشی­گذاری» و «پیچیدگی و گستردگی مسئلة فقر» مطرح شده­ و پس از آن با مراجعه به خبرگان و کسب آرای آنان، صحت فرضیه‌های تحقیق بررسی شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می­دهد که هر سه عامل فوق بر اثربخش نبودن عملکرد سیستم خط مشی­گذاری در زمینة فقرزدایی مؤثر بوده­اند، اما نقش و تأثیر مؤلفة «ناکارآمدی سیستم خط مشی­گذاری» بیش از دو عامل دیگر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the causes of Iran’s policy making system performance inefficiency regarding poverty eradication (Case study: Poverty eradication bill in Islamic Republic of Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Mehdi Alvani 1
  • Ali Asghar Pourezzat 2
  • Aniseh Nejabat 3
1 Prof., Public Administration, Department of Accounting and Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Prof., Public Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 M.A. Student in Governmental Management, Management Faculty, University of Tehran, Qum Pardis, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

‘Poverty’ as a complex and multilateral public problem is under the influence of government policies and performances regarding poverty eradication. Therefore, any change in the level of poverty in the society depends upon policy making system performance (P.M.S.P). In present research, after describing the ineffectiveness of P.M.S.P about poverty eradication, the causes of this problem have been investigated by taking case study method and focusing on the bill of “poverty eradication in Islamic Republic of Iran” (as a sample of P.M.S.P). So the main probable causes of bill’s aborting -as the causes of ineffectiveness of P.M.S.P- have been studied in the framework of research hypothesis. “The indifference and ignorance of policy makers”, “the inefficiency of public policy making system” and “extension and complexity of poverty problem” have been distinguished as the most important causes and have been assayed via gathering experts’ viewpoints. The results of research, by confirming the effect of triple factors, indicate that "the inefficiency of public policy making system" is the main cause of that problem.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • policy making system
  • poverty
  • poverty eradication
  • poverty eradication bill
Abounoori, E. & Maleki, N. (2008). Poverty line in Semnan Province during development programs (1989-2004). Social Welfare, 7(28): 215-237. (In Persian)
 
Arab Mazar, A. & Hoseininejad, M. (2004). Estimating the measure of poverty and its intensity in different job groups of Iran's rural households. Agricultural economics and development, 12(45): 113-140. (In Persian)
 
Azimi, M. (2008). Poverty reduction through small businesses. Labor and Society Journal, 100: 54-76. (In Persian)
Bennett, A. & Elman, C. (2006). Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14: 250-267.
 
Campbell, J. (2001). Human rights and poverty eradication: A talisman for the commonwealth. Asia-pacificjournal on human rights and the low, 2:
134-148.
 
Canagarajah, S. & Thomas, S. (2001). Poverty in wealthy economy: The case of Nigeria. Journal of African economies, 10 (2): 143-173.
 
Collier, P. & Dollar, D. (2001). Can the world cut poverty in half? How policy reform and effective aid can meet international development. WorldDevelopment, 29(11): 1787-1802.
 
Danaeifard, H., Shool, H. & Azar, A. (2011). Framework plan for the proposal of public policy: Combined Research. Majlis & Rahbord, 18(68): 7-32. (In Persian)
 
Dijkstra, A. (2004).Governance for sustainable poverty reduction: The social fund in Nicaragua. Public Administration and Development, 24(3): 197-211.
 
Dorosh, P. A. & Sahn, D. E. (2000). A General equilibrium analysis of the effect of macroeconomic adjustment on poverty in Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(6): 753-776.
 
Dubois, A. & Gibbert , M. (2009). From complexity to transparency: Managing the interplay between theory, method and empirical phenomena in IMM case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, xxx: xxx-xxx.
 
Ghai, D. (1999). Some proposals for an employment strategy for human development, poverty eradication and environmental regeneration. Development, 42(3): 90-96.
 
Gholipour, R., Pourseyed, B. & Hamidizadeh, A. & Amiri, A. (2010). Studying the effect of policy research in policy making area. Journal of Public Administration, 2(4): 127-144. (In Persian)
 
Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, D. & Gurgel, A. (2004). Trade policy and poverty reduction in Brazil. TheWorld Bank Economic Review, 18(3):
289-317.
 
Hertel, T. W., Ivanic, M., Preckel, P. V. & Cranfield, J. A. L. (2004). The earnings effects of multilateral trade liberalization: Implications for poverty. The World Bank Economic Review, 18(2): 205-236.
 
Imig, D. R. (2002). Book review: American Politics: Who speaks for the Poor? National interest groups and social policy, By R. Allen Hays, 277 p., New York: Routledge; The American Political Science Review, 96(3): 640.
 
Ishida, A. & Asmuni, A. (1998). Poverty eradication and income distribution in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 28(3): 327.
 
Jahanian, N. (2003). The development goals by systematic approach. research institute for contemporary thought and culture. Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Javaheripour, M. (2004). Social policy and poverty. social welfare, 3(12): 41-70.
(In Persian)
 
Khaledi, K. & Permeh, Z. (2005). Investigating poverty status in urban and rural regions of Iran (1996-2003). Agricultural Economics and Development, 13(49): 57-82. (In Persian)
 
Khaledi, K., Yazdani, S. & Haghighatnejad Shirazi, A. (2008). Study of Iran's rural poverty and determining its effective factors by emphasis on investment in agricultural sector. The Economic Researches of Iran, 10(35): 205-228.
(In Persian)
 
Khan, S. (2008). The case in case-based design of educational software: A methodological interrogation. Education Tech Research Dev,56: 423–447.
 
Mahmoudi, V. (2007). Measuring poverty and income distribution in Iran. Samt. Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Mc Kinley, T. (2001). Macro Economic Policy, Growth and Poverty Reduction. St. Martin press. Palgrave. New York.
 
Mehrbani, V. (2008). The effect of education on poverty and income inequality. Journal of economic research, 43(1): 208-225. (In Persian)
 
Moghimi, M. (2006). Particular issues in public management. Samt. Tehran.
 (In Persian)
 
Monavvarian, A., Moghimi, M., Movahedi, M. & Hoseinzadeh, M. (2012). Explanation of policy-making for export promotion with using grounded theory strategy. Journal of public administration, 4(11): 123-144. (In Persian)
 
Nafari, N. (2012). A theoretical model: Exploring administrative and political domain. Journal of public administration, 4(10): 153-172. (In Persian)
 
Najafi, B. & Shoushtarian, A. (2007). Estimating poverty line and investigating determinants of poverty for rural and urban households in Iran. Agricultural economics and development, 15(59):1-24. (In Persian)
Osei, Ph. (2002). A critical assessment of Jamaica's national poverty eradication programme. Journal of International Development, 14(6): 773-788.
 
Parvin, S. (1994). The trend of poverty in some jobs and the effective factors of its discount (in urban regions of Iran). Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Raghfar, H. & Ibrahimi, A. (2008). Income Inequalities in Iran during 1984-2006. social welfare, 7(28): 9-34. (In Persian)
 
Raghfar, H. (2001), Application of fuzzy set theory to poverty analysis,Thesis, university of Essex. England.
 
Ramakrishnan, H. (2003). Poverty eradication and the Indian media, Media Asia; 30(1): ProQuest Asian Business and Reference, p. 5.
 
Roshandel Arbatani, T., Razi, H. & Labbafi, S. (2006). Pathological study of the policy making process in the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), Journal of Public Administration, 4(10): 79-100. (In Persian)
 
Saei, A. (2007). Research method in social sciences (By Critical Rationality Approach). Samt. Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Saei, A. (2008). Globalization and poverty. Politic Quarterly, 38(1): 71-101. (In Persian)
 
Seifollahi, B. (1998). Employment policy and combating poverty and deprivation. Labor and Society Journal, 28: 6-10. (In Persian)
 
Souri, D. (1998). Poverty and Economic Macro policies (1988-1998). Plan and Budget. 3(10/11): 155-183. (In Persian)
 
Sumner, A. & Jones, N. (2008). The politics of poverty policy. IDPR, 30(4):
 359-376.
 
Tarazkar, M. & Zibaie, M. (2004). Investigating social welfare criterions and the distribution of income and poverty in rural and urban societies: Case study of Fars, Isfahan and Semnan provinces. Agricultural economics and development, 12(45): 113-140. (In Persian)
 
Veit-Wilson, J. (1999).The tax threshold: Policy, principles and poverty. Twentieth Century British History, 10(2): 218-234.
 
Williams, L., Kjonstad, A. & Robson, P. (2003). Law and poverty: The Legal System and Poverty Reduction. International Studies in Poverty Research/Zed Books. London.