Devising the Structure of a Nanotechnology Innovation Ecosystem (A Focus on the Role of Research and Technology Organizations in Developing the Nanotechnology Innovation Ecosystem)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Prof., Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD Candidate, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective
Nanotechnology has begun to operate in Iran since the beginning of the 1980s in line with the attention of the world community towards this technology. This innovation ecosystem has developed and obtained significant achievements, particularly in the field of science in the twenty-year life cycle of nanotechnology. However, the number of patents and the income from the sale of Nano-products have not grown in proportion with the development of scientific indicators. As the optimal activity of an ecosystem is the result of a joint effort of a diverse set of actors and the relationships among them, the purpose of this research is to analyze the current structure of this ecosystem and its communication mechanisms to make proposals for improving the design of ecosystem structure.
Methods
This is an interpretive piece of research, which carried out the Action Research strategy with three cycles of actions. Conducting this research, a conceptual model was outlined as the framework for the structural design of the Nano Ecosystem in Iran, based on the Viable System Model. Then, the actors active in the ecosystem were identified and located in the designed conceptual model to determine the established structure of the ecosystem and its shortcomings. Finally, based on the theoretical foundations and attitudes of experts, proposals for the optimal design of the ecosystem structure were made. The data of the research was collected in a targeted manner by reviewing documents, distributing questionnaires, and forming focus groups to confirm the obtained results.
Results
According to the designed conceptual model by the researchers and the goals of the second ten-year document on nanotechnology development, it is necessary to create an important actor called "Research and Technology Organization" to be responsible for connecting industry and university in the Innovation Ecosystem of Nanotechnology. In addition, the establishment of communication mechanisms such as industry support programs and research and development consortia are crucial for realizing ecosystem goals.
Conclusion
The purposes of the innovation ecosystem are achieved when all the actors are active and the relationships among them are properly established. In order to achieve such goals, the Innovation Ecosystem of Nanotechnology in Iran requires the creation of actors and communication mechanisms that do not currently exist. The major absent player in this ecosystem is an organization called "Research and Technology Organization", which is responsible for facilitating the process of communication between industry and university.

Keywords

References

Abdoli, Gh. (2007). National Innovative System, Innovation and Catch-up. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 9(31): 103 – 126. (in Persian)
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 148, 98-107.
Amirat, A., Zaidi, M. (2019). Estimating GDP growth in Saudi Arabia under the government’s vision 2030: a knowledge-based economy approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 1-26.
Bassis, N. F. & Armellini, F. (2018). Systems of innovation and innovation ecosystems: a literature review in search of complementarities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28: 1053–1080.
Burns, T.R., T. Baumgartner, and P. DeVille, Man. (1985). Decisions, and Society: The Theory of Actor-System Dynamics for Social Scientists.
Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M. & Etxebarria, G. )1997(. Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organizational Dimentions. Research Policy, 26: 475- 491.
Cutler, T. )2008(. Venturous Australia, building strength in innovation. Cutler and company Ltd.
Earto. (2015). Knowing your innovation ecosystem actors: data on European RTOs.
Espejo, R. (2003). The Viable System Model: A Briefing About Organizational Structure.
Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University. (Accessed November 2009) http://www.lab.brown.edu/pubs/ themes_ed/act_research.pdf
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Tec novation The International Journal of Technological Innovation.
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2007). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2008). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2009). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2010). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2011). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2012). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2013). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2014). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2015). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2016). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2017). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2018). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2019). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council. (2020). Performance Report of Nanotechnology Innovation Council. Tehran. (in Persian)
Kayal, A. (2008). A. National Innovation Systems: A Proposed Framework for Developing Countries. Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 74-86.
Kotiadis, K. & Mingers, J. (2006). Combining PSMs with hard OR methods: the philosophical and practical challenges. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57:856–867.
Maghe, V. & Cincera, M. (2016). Implementation of innovation policy in a national innovation system perspective a typology, 1–29.
Mcniff, J. & Whitehead, J. (2009). You and your action research project. London: Routledge; Taylor and Francis.
Mercan, B., & Göktaş, D. (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76(76), 102–112.
Mingers, J. & Rosenhead, J. (2009). An Overview of Related Methods: VSM, System Dynamics, and Decision Analysis.
Moore, J. F. )1996(. The Death of Competition: Leadership & Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York: Harper Paperbacks.
Naebi, H. (1999). Content Analysis: Fundamentals of Methodology. Tehran: Ravesh Publication. (in Persian)
OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems.
Oh, D.S., Philips, F., Park, S. & Lee, E. )2016(. Innovation Ecosystem: A critical Examination. Technovation, 54: 1-6.
Rezk, S. S., & Gamal, S. (2019). The viable system model and its applications in higher education: an overview. Kybernetes, 48(3), 438–450.
Schienstock, G. & Hamalainen, T. (2001). Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System: A network approach. Helsinki : Sitra Reports series, 7.
Tabatabaeian, S.H., Tahoori, H., Taghva, M., & Taghavi Fard, S.M. (2018). Analysis of innovation ecosystem of Iranian biopharmaceuticals. Journal of Technology Management 6(1): 9 -45. (in Persian)
Toprak, S., & Torlak, N. G. (2018). An Adaptive Use of Viable System Model with Knowledge System Diagnostics Serving Industrial Democracy in a Textile Manufacturing Company. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 31(1). Acess at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9419-6.
Vahidi Monfared, A. & Ali Ahmadi, A. (2018). Mapping a national institution in the Iranian science and technology system using the Viable system model to achieve upstream goals. Management Research in Iran, 21(4): 29 – 49. (in Persian)
Xu, G., Hu, W., Qiao, Y. & Zhou, Y. (2020). Mapping an innovation ecosystem using network clustering and community identification: a multi - layered framework. Scientometrics, 124: 2057 - 2081.
Zahedi, H., Rahmati, F.S. (2016). A to Z: A Narrative of Iran's Entry into Nanotechnology Policy. Tehran: Bonyad Tose Farda. (in Persian)
Zhou, L., Zhang, S., & Hu, L. (2017). How RTOs innovate innovation—Review on the 23rd WAITRO biennial congress and general assembly., Acta Technica, 6:17-26.
Zolfagharzadeh., M.M. & Norouzi, Kh. (2012). Viable Scientific system: a proposal to maintain the reliability of industry, government, and national in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Management in the Islamic University, 3(1): 379 – 400. (in
Journal of Public Administration
Volume 14, Issue 3
2022
Pages 318-345

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics