Bureauphobia: the Ambivalentl Look of Citizens on Public Services

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Public Administration, Farabi Campus of Tehran University, Qom, Iran

2 Assistant Prof. in Public Administration, Farabi Campus of Tehran University, Qom, Iran

3 Prof. in Public Administration, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Several studies have been conducted on the negative image of public administration among citizens. Most of these studies have considered the government's inefficiency, and rarely has study the ambivalent look of citizens to public services. The purpose of this descriptive-correlational study is to conceptualize and identify it, was conducted in two stages. Initially, bureauphobia was verified by analyzing the information obtained from the evaluation of the performance of governmental organizations. In the next step, by survey the citizens, some of the individual variables that were effective on the bureauphobia were identified. The statistical population of the survey was all citizens 18 to 70. The research instrument was questionnaire and documents. Logistic regression was conducted. The results showed that distrust of the government and public sector's employees were not necessarily related to the performance of public services. The results showed that 29 percent of respondents were bureauphobia. Also, the results indicated that age, gender, education level, and times of referrals are related to bureauphobia, but income and type of occupation with bureauphobia are not significant.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Alvani, S. M. & Danaeefard, H. (2001). Speeches in the philosophy of government organization theories. Tehran: Safar Publishing. (in Persian)
Azad, H. (1994). Psychological Pathology. Tehran: Besat. (in Persian)
Azimi, H. (2010). Survey on the Satisfaction of Servicemen with Services Provision in Public administrative of Zanjan Province in 2008. Zanjan: Zanjan Province Pub. (in Persian)
Berman, E.M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57 (2), 105 – 112.
Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S. & Kampen, J. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71 (2), 229-240. (in Persian)
Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2003). Trust in Government – the Significance of Attitudes Towards Democracy, the Public Sector and Public Sector Reforms. Working Paper, Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, Bergen University Research Foundation.
Danaeefard, H. & Faghihi, A. (2005). Bureaucracy and development in Iran, Tehran: Rasa. (in Persian)
Del Pino, E., Calzada, I. & Díaz-Pulido, J.M. (2016). Conceptualizing and Explaining Bureauphobia: Contours, Scope, and Determinants. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 725–736.
Denhardt, R.B. & Baker, D.I. (2007). Five great issues in organizational theory. In handbook of Public Administration, Rabit, Hildreth, Taylor & Francis Group.
Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy, Democracy, and Public Administration: Editor’s Brief Introduction to the Symposium. Public Organization Review, 10(3), 205–207.

Hedayat, R. & Elmi, M. (2012). The examination of Citizens’ satisfaction with the performance of municipal services and socio-economic factors associated with it Nagadeh city. Sociology Studies, 4 (16), 29-47. (in Persian)

Heidari, A. (2014). Investigating the effect of official organizations on the institutional trust of citizens (The case: Yasuj youth). Sociology of Social Institutions, 2(1), 77-106. (in Persian)
Heywood, A. (2009). Political theory: an introduction. Tehran: Ghoomes.
Kazemi, S. A. A. (2000). Political management & public policy. Tehran: Daftarnashr. (in Persian)
Lotfi, E. & Yari, M. S. (2014). Measurement of clients’ Satisfaction from NAJA Performance (The case: Ilam City). Police Organization Development, 12(53), 53-69. (in Persian)
Marvel, J.D. (2015). Unconscious Bias in Citizens’ Evaluations of Public Sector Performance. Journal of Public Administration research and Theory, 26 (1), 143 – 158.
Masoudnia, H., Moradi, G. M. & Mohamadifar, N. (2009). The effect of students' political knowledge on their change in political system legitimacy based on weber's theory: case study of University of Isfahan. Political Science Research, 4 (4), 201-230. (in Persian)
Mohseni, M. (2000). A survey on social knowledge, attitudes and behaviors in Tehran. Tehran: Zohd. (in Persian)
Nachmias, D. & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1978). .Bureaucratic culture: Citizens and administrators in Israel. London: Croom Helm.
Rafiepoor, F. (1997). Extension and Development. Management Thought, 1 (2), 69-97. (in Persian)
Rafiepoor, F. (1999). Anomy or social disturbance, research on the anomy potential in Tehran. Tehran: Soroush. (in Persian)
Robinson, M. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service, Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
Rosanhan, D. L. & Seligman, M. A. P. (2012). Psychological Pathology. Translated by Y. Seyed Mohamadi, Tehran: Arasbaran. (in Persian)
Saei, A. & Hayati, F. (2013). Sociological analysis of trust in police in Shiraz. Social Security Studies, 4 (35), 13-45. (in Persian)
Sarfaraz, F. (2002). The concept of legitimacy and different approaches to it. Political - Economical Magazine, 177 &178, 46-61. (in Persian)

Seyd, B. (2015). How do citizens evaluate public officials? The role of performance and expectations on political trust. Political Studies, 63 (1), 73-90.

Sharifi Kloei, M. (2000). A Model for the Knowledge and Pathology of Organizations. Management & Development, 2 (5), 8-19. (in Persian)
Tahmasebi, R. (2013). An introduction to the public Administration theories. Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian)
Van Ryzin, G.G. (2011). Outcomes, Process and Trust of Civil Servant. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (4), 745 –760.

Yaghoubi Choubari, A. & Jalili Damdel, M. (2014). The Evaluation of Management Social Power and its Relationship with Clientele Satisfaction (Case of Study: Agencies in Khalkhal City). Iranian Social Development Study, 6 (2), 66-80. (in Persian)