مقایسه الگوهای حاکمیتی مبارزه با ویروس کرونا

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، مؤسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی، تهران، ایران.

2 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، مؤسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه‎ریزی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: در پژوهش حاضر تلاش شده است تا الگوهای حاکمیتی در کشورهای مختلف در خصوص ویروس کرونا با یکدیگر مقایسه شود.
روش: این پژوهش از نوع مطالعه تطبیقی است. در این پژوهش 31 کشور درگیر ویروس کرونا که دارای بیشترین میزان گسترش بودند، بررسی شدند. داده‌های ثانویه از سازمان‌های بین‌المللی یا منطقه‌ای پایش‌کننده ویروس کرونا گردآوری و تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که در کشورهای بررسی‌شده، تعداد فوت‌شدگان و میزان گسترش کرونا در سطح مورد انتظار است، با وجود به‌کارگیری خط‌مشی‌های مشابه در مبارزه با کرونا، ابزارهای اجرای خط‌مشی متفاوت است، سازوکارهای هماهنگی زیر نظر بالاترین مقام اجرایی طراحی شده‌اند، ظرفیت حاکمیتی در مبارزه با کرونا پایین و سخت‌گیری حکومتی بالاست و ثبات سیاسی تنها مؤلفه تعالی حاکمیتی مؤثر بر نرخ گسترش کروناست.
نتیجه‌گیری: پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده در زمینه مبارزه با ویروس کرونا کمتر با رویکرد حاکمیتی انجام شده است. این پژوهش توانست با بررسی مقایسه‌ای الگوهای حاکمیتی مبارزه با کرونا در کشورهای مختلف، شباهت‌ها و تفاوت‌های این کشورها را آشکار کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative Study of Governance Patterns in the Battle against the Coronavirus

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farajollah Rahnavard 1
  • Nahid Jebeli 2
1 Associate Prof., Department of Public Administration, Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS), Tehran, Iran.
2 MSc., Department of Information Technology, Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: In the present study, an attempt has been made to compare the governance patterns in relation to the coronavirus in the studied countries.
Methods: The research method is a comparative study and 31 countries with the highest prevalence of coronavirus have been studied. Secondary data were collected and analyzed from international or regional organizations monitoring coronavirus.
Results: The research findings show that in the studied countries 1) the death rate and the expansion rate of coronavirus are at the expected level; 2) despite using similar policies in the fight against Corona, the policy implementation tools are different; 3) management and coordination mechanisms are designed under the supervision of the highest executive authority; 4) governance capacity in the fight against Coronavirus is low, but the government stringency is high; and 5 political stability is the only component of governance excellence that affects the rate of corona expansion.
Conclusion: Studies on the fight against Coronavirus have been less conducted with a governance approach. The study was able to reveal the similarities and differences between the governing patterns of the fight against Corona in different countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Expansion rate
  • Coordination mechanism
  • Governance capacity
  • Government Stringency
ابطحی، محمد‌علی (1399). مبارزه با کرونا: الگوی مدیریتی کشور، روزنامه ایران،30 اردیبهشت، شماره 7375. قابل دسترسی در آدرس:                                                https://www.irannewspaper.ir/newspaper/ item/546248
نهاد ریاست جمهوری (1399)، مجموعه مصوبات ستاد ملی مقابله با کرونا، بخش اول، معاونت امور دولت، دفتر هیئت دولت
 
References
Abtahi, M. A. (2020). Fighting the Corona: The Model of Country Management, Iran Newspaper. No. 7375, July 23 Retrieved from https://www.irannewspaper.ir/newspaper/ item/546248. (in Persian)
Barbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.), Belmon, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Choi, T. (2020). Innovative “Bring-Service-Near-Your-Home” operations under Corona-Virus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) outbreak: Can logistics become the Messiah? Transportation Research, 4, 12-28.
Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(S1), 189–197.
Economy, E.C. (2020). The Hydra Vs. the Headless Horeman: China and the United States, Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/blog/hydra-vs-headless-horseman-china-and-united-states.
Graham, J., Amos, B., and Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21th Century: Policy Brief No.15, Institute on Governance, Ottawa, Canada.
Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Majumdar, S. and Tatlow, H. (2021). A global paneldatabase of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government ResponseTracker). Nature Human Behaviour, 5: 529-538.
Howlett M., Ramesh M., and Perl A. (2009). Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
https://media.cabinetoffice.ir/uploads/org/2020/09/07/159946590065333800.pdf
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Cao, B. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. 
IATA (2021). Covid-19 Travel Regulations Map, Retrieved from https://www.iatatravelcentre.com/world.php.
IHME (2021). Covid-19 Projections, Retrieved from https://covid19.healthdata.org
IMF (2021). Polcy Responses to Covid-19, available at https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.
James, S. and Ben-Gera, M. (2004). A Comparative Analysis of Government Offices in OECD Countries, Public   Governance   Committee.   Paris: Organisation   for   Economic   Co - operation and Development.
Juiz, C., Guerrero, C., and Lera, I. (2014). Implementing Good Governance Principles for the Public Sector in Information Technology Governance Frameworks, Open Journal of Accounting, 3, 9-27.
Kunicova, J. (2020). Driving the COVID-19 Response from the Center: Institutional Mechnisms to Ensure Whole of Government Coordition, World Bank Governance Global Practice.
Manoj, M. G., Satheesh Kumar, M. K., Valsaraj, K. T., Sivan, C., and Vijayan. S. K. (2020). Potential link between compromised air quality and transmission of the novel corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) in affected areas, Environmental Research, 10, 1-21.
Martin, E., Nolte, I., & Vitolo, E. (2016). The Four Cs of disaster partnering: Communication, cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Disasters, 40(4), 621–643.
Mette-Kjaer, A. (2004). Governance: Key Concepts, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Combining structural forms in the search for policy tools: Incident command systems in US crisis management. Governance, 21(2), 205–229.
NHAC (2020). Collection of Approvals of the National Headquarters against Corona, Part I, Deputy Minister of Government Affairs, Cabinet Office (in Persian).
Our World in Data (2021). Policy Responses to the Coronavirus Pandemic, Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/policy-responses-covid.
Phung Dang, T.K., Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., and A., B. (2015). A Framework for Assessing Governance Capacity: An Illustration from Vietnam’s Forestry Reforms, Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 0(0), 1-21.
UNESCO (2021). Global Monitoring of School Closures, Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
Van der Voorn, T.; de Jong, M. (2021). Cope or Perish? ManagingTipping Points in Developing Coping Strategies for Emergency Responseduring the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Europe. COVID 2021, 1(1), 39-70; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid1010005
Waugh, W. L., Jr., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 131–140.
WGI (2020). Worldwide Governance Indicators, Retrieved from https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
WHO (2021). Coronavirus, about Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), World Health Organization, Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health-topics.
Worldometer (2020). Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus