بررسی اهمیت میانجی مؤلفۀ احساس بی ‏قدرتی در میزان تأثیر ادراک از پاسخ‏ گویی بر رفتار مشارکتی دانشجویان (مطالعۀ موردی: دانشجویان دانشگاه تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس‎ارشد مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدۀ مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

 این پژوهش رابطۀ بین ادراک از پاسخ‌گویی و مشارکت شهروندی را با در نظر گرفتن متغیر احساس بی‏قدرتی میان دانشجویان دانشگاه تهران بررسی می‌کند. سؤال اصلی این است که دانشجویان تا چه حد متأثر از میزان ادراک خود از ساختار پاسخ‌گویی هستند و بر این اساس رفتارهای مشارکتی خود را تعریف می‌کنند؟ علت اصلی اجرای این پژوهش توجه به این نکته است که احساس پاسخ‌گویی نامناسب از سوی تصمیم‌گیران می‏تواند حس ناتوانی برای تأثیرگذاری بر فرایندها را در دانشجویان ایجاد ‌کند و سبب بی‏انگیزگی آنها در همکاری و مشارکت‌های سازمانی ‌شود. در این راستا تجزیه‎‏‎وتحلیل داده‏ها به‎کمک روش‏های همبستگی پیرسون، رگرسیون خطی و مدل معادلات ساختاری در نرم‏افزارهای مختص به هریک صورت گرفته است. نتایج نشان می‏دهد ادراک از پاسخ‌گویی با تأثیر بر متغیر احساس بی‏قدرتی بر مشارکت دانشجویان تأثیرگذار است. همچنین ادراک مجرد دانشجویان از ابعاد پاسخ‌گویی اخلاقی، قانونی، دموکراتیک و سیاسی، قابلیت پیش‏بینی میزان احساس بی‏قدرتی و به‌تبع آن میزان مشارکت آنها را به همراه خواهد داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The mediating role of sense of powerlessness on the relationship between perceived accountability and the participation behavior of college students case study : Students of University of Tehran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Kamal Vaezi 1
  • Reza Rahbar 2
1 Associate Prof., Faculty of Management, Tehran University
2
چکیده [English]

This study examines the mediating role of sense of powerlessness on the relationship between the perception of accountability and citizenship participation among the students of university of Tehran. Lack of proper accountability can lead to a sense of powerlessness for students to influencing the processes and cause them no incentive to provide cooperation. Accordingly, accountability variable has been analyzed in general and in the six dimensions, include ethical, legal, democratic, financial, performance and political. In this regard, the analysis of data using Pearson correlation, linear regression and structural equation modeling was done by SPSS and Lisrel software. The results show that the student’s perception of accountability affects their participation by affecting the sense of powerlessness variable. In addition, students perception of accountability of moral, legal, political and democratic, can predict their sense of powerlessness and consequently to predict the level of their participation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Accountability
  • Citizen participation
  • Sense of powerlessness
  • structural equation model
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. AIP Journal, 35(4): 216-224.
Blagescu, M., L. Casas, D.L. & Lioyd, R. (2005). Pathway to accountability, the global accountability, London: One World Trust.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4): 447-468.
Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue & as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5): 946-967.
Bradbury, M.D. & Williams, M.R. (2012). Diversity and Citizen Participation: The Effect of Race on Juror Decision Making. Administration & Society, Online First Version of Record - Oct 8: 1-20.
Coffe, H. & Geys, B. (2008). Measuring the Bridging Nature of Voluntary Organizations: The Importance of Association Size. Sociology, 42(2): 357-369.
Cornwall, A. & Gaventa, J. (2001). Bridging the gap: citizenship, participation and accountability. In the PLA Notes 40: Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment, National Lotteries Charity Board.
Coser, L.A. (2007). Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. Translated by M. Salasi. Tehran, Elmi press. (in Persian)
Danaee Fard, H. & Rostamy, A. (2007). Promoting Public Trust in Public Organizations: Explaining the Role of Public Accountability. Public Organization Review, 7(4): 331-344.
Dowdle, M. (2006). Public accountability: Conceptual, historical & epistemic mappings. London, Cambridge University Press.
Ghaffary, G. & Jamshidzadeh, E. (2011). Popular participation and Urban Affairs (Barriers, problems and strategies for the development of popular participation). Tehran, Society and Culture press. (in Persian)
Jensen, L. (2000). Image of accountability in Danish public Sector form. Discussion paper for IPMN Conference 2000 at Macquarie School of Management.
Kahne, J.E. & Sporte, S.E. (2008). Developing Citizens: The Impact of Civic Learning Opportunities on Students’ Commitment to Civic Participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3): 738-766.
Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy.International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2): 275-293.
Min, S. & Mentzer, J.T. (2004). Developing and measuring supply chain management Concepts. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1): 63-100.
Mirsepasi, N. & Etebarian, A. (2009).Reform of the Iran’s administrative system based on the model of balance of power. Tehran, Mir press. (in Persian)
Mohseni-Tabrizi, A. (2002). Pathology of the socio-cultural alienation: value isolation in Tehran’s state universities. Quarterly journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 8(4): 119-182. (in Persian)
Mohseni-Tabrizi, A. (2004). Fatalism measure and its relation to the sense of political efficacy and sense of powerlessness among adult women in urban areas. Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(9): 169-201. (in Persian)
Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Omotayo, O.A., Abiodun, A.J. & Fadugba, A.O. (2012). Executives Perception of the Impact of Flexitime on Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Nigerian Private Sector. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics, 1(3): 16-27.
Rabbani, R. & Aranchoolam, D. & Abbas-Zadeh, M. & Ghasemi, V. (2007). The impact of economic and social welfare on the citizens' participation in municipal affairs (case study: city of Isfahan). Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2):73-99. (in Persian)
Roberts, N. (2008). The age of direct citizen participation. Armonk, NewYork, M.E. Sharpe.
Shakoori, A. (2011). Social participations and Charity para-governmental organizations: with an emphasis on Iran. Tehran, SAMT press. (in Persian)
Sharifian Sani, M. (2001). Urban Culture: citizen participation, urban governance & urban management. Journal of urban management 8: 42-55. (in Persian)
Stout, M. (2010). Symposium introduction: Deliberative democracy and participatory practice. Public Administration and Management, 15(1): 1-8.
Uzzaman, W. & Mphande, C. (2012). Gaps in Pursuing Participatory Good Governance: Bangladesh. Administration & Society, 44(s5): 1-33.
Vaezi, R. & Azmandian, M. (2011). Three-dimensional accountability model: a different look to accountability. Journal of Law enforcement management studies, 6(1): 131-155. (in Persian)
Yazdan-panah, L. (2007). The Barriers to social participation among the citizens of Tehran. Social Welfare Quarterly, 7(26): 105-130. (in Persian)
Zhang, W., Johnson, T.J., Seltzer, T. & Bichard, S.L. (2010). The Revolution Will is Networked: The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Attitudes and Behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1): 75-92.