طراحی مدل سازمان هولوگراف با استفاده از مدل‎سازی ساختاری تفسیری با رویکرد تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة مدیریت و دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف اصلی این مقاله طراحی مدل سازمان هولوگراف به‎کمک شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در آن است. سازمان هولوگراف با توجه به مؤلفه‏های ظرفیت­سازی پویا، محیط کل­گرا، سرمایۀ انسانی کارآمد، خودمدیریتی فزاینده و ساختار هوشمندانه، درصدد است تا کیفیت کل را در همۀ اجزا متبلور کند؛ به­گونه­ای که سیستم توانایی خودسازماندهی داشته باشد. روش پژوهش از نظر ماهیت اکتشافی، از نظر هدف بنیادی ـ کاربردی و از نظر روش توصیفی ـ پیمایشی با رویکرد ترکیبی است. در این مقاله، عوامل اصلی سازمان هولوگراف از عمق مبانی نظری استخراج شده است. به‎کمک روش دلفی و امتیازدهی به عوامل، از طریق تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی پنج­­ مؤلفۀ جدید شناسایی و نام­گذاری شد. این مؤلفه­ها توانستند 056/87 درصد از عوامل مؤثر بر طراحی سازمان­ هولوگراف را پوشش ­دهند. طراحی مدل با بهره‎مندی ‏از روش مدل‎سازی ساختاری‌ تفسیری انجام گرفت. روایی ابزار را خبرگان امر و جدول واریانس تبیین‎شدۀ جامع تأیید کردند و پایایی آن به‎کمک ضریب آلفای کرونباخ (964/0) به تأیید رسید. یافته­های پژوهش نشان داد مؤلفه­های مدل با یکدیگر ارتباط یک­سویه دارند و مؤلفۀ محیط کل­گرا بیشترین تأثیر را بر سایر مؤلفه­ها می‎گذارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Design of the holographic organization model using interpretive structural modeling with approach of exploratory factor analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra foroutani 1
  • Amir lalisarabi 2
1 Assistant Prof., Faculty of Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate, Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The main of this paper is designing a model for Holographic Organization with identify the factors that effects on it. Designing the holographic organization regarding components as dynamic capacity building, holistic environment, efficient human capital, increased self-managing, and smart structure aims at crystallizing the entire quality in each single part with the intention. This article is exploratory by nature and fundamental – applied measuring and descriptive – survey to the methodology. Then using the Delphi technique and scoring 23 detected factors via exploratory factor analysis, 5 new components were identified and labeled. These components could cover 87.056% of the factors affecting the design of holographic organization. Hence, to plan and codify the model and make out the relationship between principles the method of ISM was utilized. Validity was approved by experts and Total Variance Explained and its reliability Cronbach Alpha Coefficient set as 0.964 was confirmed. The results showed that the components of model were related to each other unilateral and holistic environmental has most influential on other components.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis
  • holographic organization
  • Interpretive structural modeling
  • self-organization
Akgun, A., Byrne, E., John, C., Lynn, G., Keskin, S., Halit. (2007). Organizational Unlearning as Changes in Beliefs and Routines in Organizations. JournalofOrganizationalChangeManagement, 20 (6): 794-812.
Alvani, S. M. (1992). Metaphor: A Tool for Understanding Organizations. ManagementStudies, 2 (7): 23-52. (inPersian)
Alvani, S. M. (1999). Reflecting the Effects of Irregularities Theory in Management. ManagementStudies, 7 (21&22): 38-53. (inPersian)
Rae, A. (2008). AHolographicOrganization:Whatisit?andwhywouldwewantone? Available in: HoloScopethehologram@comcast.net.
Mandal, A. & Deshmukh, S.G. (1994). Vender Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modeling.IJOPM, 14(6): 52-59.
Argyris, C. & Schon, D. (1996). Organizationallearning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Brown, M. E. & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making Things Click Distributive leadership in an Online Division of an offline Organization. TheLeadershipQuarterly, 13 (4): 397-419.
Chang, S. C., Lee, M. S. (2007).Study on Relationship Among Leadership, Organizational Culture, the Operation of Learning Organization and Employees’ Job Satisfaction. TheLearningOrganization, 14(2): 155-185.
Cowley, S. (1995). Professional Development and Change in a Learning Organization. JournalofAdvancedNursing, 21(5): 965-974.
Danaeefard, H. (2007) Competing Paradigms in Organizational Science and Management: a Comparative Approach to Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology. JournalofDaneshvarRaftar, 14 (26): 89-104. (inPersian)
Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures. OrganizationStudies, 14(3): 375-394.
Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning. AcademyofManagementReview, 10(4): 803-813.
Gephart, M.A., Marsick, V.J. (1996). Learning Organizations Come Alive. Training&Development, 50(12): 35-45.
Gholipour, A., Pourezzat, A., Hazrati, M. (2009). Investigate the Effect of Servant Leadership on Organizational Trust and Empowerment in Public Organizations. JournalofPublicAdministration, 1 (2): 103-118. (inPersian)
Gleic, J. (1993). Chaos:MakingaNewScience. N. Y. Publisher, Viking Adult.
Goh, S.C., Ryan, P.J. (2002). Learning Capability, Organizational Factors and Firm Performance, ThirdEuropeanConferenceonOrganizationalKnowledge, LearningandCapabilities;Athens,Greece, April 5-6, 3-11.
Harari, O. (1994). The Brain- Based Organization. ManagementReview, 83(6).
Hatch M. J. (1997). OrganizationTheory:Modern,SymbolicandPostmodernPerspective. Translated by Hasan Danaeefard (2010), 7th Edition, Tehran: Mehraban Nashr press. (inPersian)
Huber, G.P. (1991). Learning: The Contributing, Process and The Literature. OrganizationScience, 2(1): 88-100.
James, C.R. (2003). Designing Learning Organizations; OrganizationalDynamics, 32(1): 46-61.
Johannessen, J. (2007).TheHolographicOrganization–ADesignModel, Bodf Graduate School of Business, Mfrkved, Norway Version of Record First Published.
Khorsandi Taskuh, A. (2008). DiscourseofInterdisciplinaryknowledge. Tehran: Institute of Social and Cultural Studies. (inPersian)
Kivi, R., Kampenhood, L. (2009). ResearchmethodinSocialSciences, Translated by Abdolhossein Nikgohar, 7th Edition, Tehran: Tootia press. (inPersian)
Love, P., Irani, Z. (2000). TQM and Learning Lrganization: A Dialogue for Change in Contraction. JournalofManagement&Economics, 18 (3): 321-331.
Luhman, N. (1995). SocialSystems. Translated by Bednatz & Baecker. Stanford. Calif. Stanford University Press.
Marquardt, M.J. (2006). TheLearningOrganization. Translated by Mohammad reza zali. First published, Tehran: University of Tehran. (inPersian)
Maturana, H. and Varela, E. (1980). AutopoeisisandCognition:TheRealizationoftheLiving, London: Reidl. Publishers.
Morgan, G. (1995).ImagesofOrganization. London: Beverly Hills.
Moshabbaki, A. (2004) ImagesofOrganization:OverviewtoGarethMorganvaluableimpactontheorganizationanditsmetaphors. Tehran: University of Tehran press (UTP). (inPersian)
Noble Bram, F. (2000). Institutional Criteria for Co-management, MarinePolicy, 24 (1): 69-77.
Pirayesh, R., Bashkoh, M., Pahlavanigomi, M., Alipour, V. (2010). Investigate the Effect of Learning Processes on Performance in International Cooperation. JournalofPublicAdministration, 2 (4): 39-54. (inPersian)
Robbines, S. P. (2007). OrganizationalBehavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Robert, K. (2006). Management. Austin, Texas Area:  Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Rowley, J. & Gibbs, P. (2008). From Learning Organization to Practically Wise Organization. Journalofthelearningorganization, 15(5): 356-372.
Saenge, P. M. (1990). TheFifthDiscipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Sarlak, M. (2007). Organizational Learning throws Designing Hologhraphic Organizations. Peik-e-NoorPress, 6 (3): 162-170. (inPersian)
Sarlak, M. (2008). AgeofKnowledgeOrganizations. Tehran: University of Payam-e- Noor Press. (inPersian)
Sarlak, M., A. Eslami, T. (2011). Knowledge Sharing At Sharif University of Technology: Social Capital Approach. JournalofPublicAdministration, 3 (4): 1-18. (inPersian)
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., Hejazy, E. (2006). BehavioralScienceResearchMethods. Tehran: Agah Press. (inPersian)
Shelton, C. K. & Darling, J. R. (2001). The Quantum Skills Model in Management: a New Paradigm to Enhance Effective Leadership.Leadership&OrganizationDevelopmentJournal, 22(6): 264 – 273.
Sohrabi, B., Froozandeh, S., Raeisivanani, A. (2011). Providing a Comprehensive Model for Evaluating Knowledge Sharing Based on Human, Organizational and Technical Factors in Project Oriented Governmental Organizations. JournalofPublicAdministration, 3 (7): 39-54. (inPersian)
Tafreshi, Gh. (2002). ModernApproachtoOrganizationandManagementTheoriesinToday'sWorld. Tehran: Metacognitive Thinking Press. (inPersian)
Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S.G., Gupta A.D., Shankar, R. (2007). Development of a Balanced Scorecard: An Integrated Approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). InternationalJournalofProductivityandPerformanceManagement, 1(56): 25-59.
Wang, G., Wang Y.X., Zhao, T. (2008). Analysis of Interactions among the Barriers of Energy Saving in China. EnergyPolicy, 36 (6): 1879–1889.